Skip to content

CASA Duties in Georgia (in brief)

by merlin on March 26th, 2014
  • Sumo

In Georgia, a Court-Appointed Special Advocate, or CASA, is a person (appointed by the Court, plainly) whose entire purpose in a case is to advocate for the best interests of a minor child who is the subject of a deprivation proceeding in juvenile court.  Section 15-11-106 establishes the power of the Courts to appoint a CASA:

(a) (1) Before executing duties as a CASA, and upon completion of all the requirements of an affiliate court appointed special advocate program, a CASA shall be sworn in by a judge of the juvenile court in the court or circuit in which he or she wishes to serve. A CASA shall not be assigned a case prior to being sworn in by a juvenile court judge as set forth in this paragraph.

(2) If a juvenile court judge determines that a child involved in a dependency proceeding needs a CASA, the judge shall have the authority to appoint a CASA, and in such circumstance shall sign an order appointing a CASA at the earliest possible stage of the proceedings. Such order shall impose on a CASA all the duties, rights, and responsibilities set forth in this Code section and Code Sections 15-11-104 and 15-11-105.

(b) The role of a CASA in juvenile court dependency proceedings shall be to advocate for the best interests of the child.

(c) In addition to the reasons stated in subsection (h) of Code Section 15-11-104, the court may discharge a CASA upon finding that the CASA has acted in a manner contrary to the mission and purpose of the affiliate court appointed special advocate program.

The powers of the CASA are those set out for a Guardian Ad Litem in Section 15-11-105.  The duties that the CASA must fulfill are specifically written there (insert “CASA” for “Guardian Ad Litem”):

“(a) A guardian ad litem shall advocate for a child’s best interests in the proceeding for which the guardian ad litem has been appointed.

(b) In determining a child’s best interests, a guardian ad litem shall consider and evaluate all of the factors affecting the best interests of a child in the context of a child’s age and developmental needs. Such factors shall include:

(1) The physical safety and welfare of such child, including food, shelter, health, and clothing;

(2) The mental and physical health of all individuals involved;

(3) Evidence of domestic violence in any current, past, or considered home for such child;

(4) Such child’s background and ties, including familial, cultural, and religious;

(5) Such child’s sense of attachments, including his or her sense of security and familiarity and continuity of affection for the child;

(6) The least disruptive placement alternative for such child;

(7) The child’s wishes and long-term goals;

(8) The child’s community ties, including church, school, and friends;

(9) The child’s need for permanence, including his or her need for stability and continuity of relationships with a parent, siblings, and other relatives;

(10) The uniqueness of every family and child;

(11) The risks attendant to entering and being in substitute care;

(12) The preferences of the persons available to care for such child; and

(13) Any other factors considered by the guardian ad litem to be relevant and proper to his or her determination.”


The statute also sets out the minimum responsibilities of the CASA.   These may be viewed as invasive by the parent of the child, but they are statutorily-required by the CASA.  Note that this is in line with giving the CASA wide lattitude in best fulfilling his or her duties:

“(c) Unless a child’s circumstances render the following duties and responsibilities unreasonable, a guardian ad litem shall at a minimum:

(1) Maintain regular and sufficient in-person contact with the child and, in a manner appropriate to his or her developmental level, meet with and interview such child prior to custody hearings, adjudication hearings, disposition hearings, judicial reviews, and any other hearings scheduled in accordance with the provisions of this chapter;

(2) In a manner appropriate to such child’s developmental level, ascertain such child’s needs, circumstances, and views;

(3) Conduct an independent assessment to determine the facts and circumstances surrounding the case;

(4) Consult with the child’s attorney, if appointed separately, regarding the issues in the proceeding;

(5) Communicate with health care, mental health care, and other professionals involved with such child’s case;

(6) Review case study and educational, medical, psychological, and other relevant reports relating to such child and the respondents;

(7) Review all court related documents;

(8) Attend all court hearings and other proceedings to advocate for such child’s best interests;

(9) Advocate for timely court hearings to obtain permanency for such child;

(10) Protect the cultural needs of such child;

(11) Contact the child prior to any proposed change in such child’s placement;

(12) Contact the child after changes in such child’s placement;

(13) Request a judicial citizen review panel or judicial review of the case;

(14) Attend citizen panel review hearings concerning such child and if unable to attend the hearings, forward to the panel a letter setting forth such child’s status during the period since the last citizen panel review and include an assessment of the DFCS permanency and treatment plans;

(15) Provide written reports to the court and the parties on the child’s best interests, including, but not limited to, recommendations regarding placement of such child, updates on such child’s adjustment to placement, DFCS’s and respondent’s compliance with prior court orders and treatment plans, such child’s degree of participation during visitations, and any other recommendations based on the best interests of the child;

(16) When appropriate, encourage settlement and the use of any alternative forms of dispute resolution and participate in such processes to the extent permitted; and

(17) Monitor compliance with the case plan and all court orders.”

It cannot be stressed enough – the CASA is to have full access to everything involving the child, and a CASA who takes his or her job seriously ought to leave no stone unturned if there is sufficient suspicion.  The statute goes on:

“(d) (1) Except as provided in Article 11 of this chapter, a guardian ad litem shall receive notices, pleadings, or other documents required to be provided to or served upon a party and shall be notified of all court hearings, judicial reviews, judicial citizen review panels, and other significant changes of circumstances of a child’s case which he or she is appointed to the same extent and in the same manner as the parties to the case are notified of such matters.

(2) A guardian ad litem shall be notified of the formulation of any case plan of a child’s case which he or she is appointed and may be given the opportunity to be heard by the court about such plans.

(e) Upon presentation of an order appointing a guardian ad litem, such guardian ad litem shall have access to all records and information relevant to a child’s case to which he or she is appointed when such records and information are not otherwise protected from disclosure pursuant to Code Section 19-7-5. Such records and information shall not include records and information provided under Article 11 of this chapter or provided under Chapter 4A of Title 49.

(f) All records and information acquired or reviewed by a guardian ad litem during the course of his or her appointment shall be deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed except as ordered by the court.

(g) Except as provided in Code Section 49-5-41, regarding access to records, any guardian ad litem who discloses confidential information obtained during the course of his or her appointment, in violation of law, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. A guardian ad litem shall maintain all information and records regarding mental health, developmental disability, and substance abuse according to the confidentiality requirements contained in Code Section 37-3-166, 37-4-125, or 37-7-166, as applicable.

(h) In the event of a change of venue, the original guardian ad litem shall, as soon as possible, communicate with the appointed guardian ad litem in the new venue and shall forward all pertinent information to the new guardian ad litem.”


Comments are closed.